The tree of the knowledge

The main abilities that we needed in my race, besides being technical and social, have to characterize themselves by the tolerance towards the differences faced in a reduced space as it is it the classroom. This does not mean to tolerate the reduction of the movement and the feelings of the student. The techniques and the socialization are learned in means that allow us to be ourself and who do not repress the emotions, where emotion and reason are in unison a manifestation of the freedom. Nevertheless, we know that he is very difficult to arrive at this within the classroom when mechanisms do not exist that release our mentality of very known and proven structures. In this scope, the didactic and affective bows are areas that make possible many forms to work, where the education no longer enters the monotony and allows to cultural expressions, that is to say, the dialogue in the classroom and the movement of energy in the childhood. The innate thing then comes to be that substance differentiates that us from the animal and that resembles them in the subject of the union and the protection, without confusing by which the human beings we are in origin animal and by nature culture.
It trains us to the university in an ample range of theories; nevertheless, I do not feel that the professors orient giving relevance to us to the childhood, but to the pure knowledge. Fodder that is positive the fact to give theory to us, not therefore the forms in which the feedback of the knowledge works. In addition the theory although they represent the reality is not referring complete of the life of the children and children which we are ourselves faced in the classroom. It´s necessary psycho mobility, neurophysiology and didactics.